• Users Online: 95
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

Table of Contents
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 311-318

A comparison between monopolar radiofrequency ablation and electrocautery (Diathermy) ablations in left modified MAZE (short-term results)

Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Web Publication10-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Waleed El-Awady
Department of Cardiac Surgery, National Heart Institute, Cairo
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/JMISR.JMISR_51_18

Rights and Permissions

Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The classic cut-and-sew maze procedure is successful in 85–95% of patients. However, it is technically challenging and requires prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass. The left modified maze procedure is successful in 65–85% of patients. The aim of this study was to compare the success of two different ablation sources in the left modified MAZE.
Patients and methods
Between June 2010 and December 2016, 40 patients underwent left modified MAZE (Cox III) procedure: 20 patients were done with monopolar radiofrequency ablation (group A) and the other 20 patients were done with diathermy as electrocautery ablation (group B). All patients had left maze plus a concomitant operation.
The patients' mean age was 38.2 ± 12.7 years; there was no mortality or stroke or any thromboembolic events in both groups. There were 14 (35%) males and 26 (65%) females. The mean left atrial size ranged from 62.6 to 27.4 mm. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time was 115.1 ± 84.9 min. The mean cross-clamp time was 86 ± 64 min. The incidence of freedom from atrial fibrillation was 45% at the end of the operation (40% of patients with normal sinus rhythm with group A and 50% with group B), and after 1-year follow-up, this incidence increased to 67.5%, with 70% in group A and 65% in group B; only one patient required permanent pacemaker.
Although monopolar radiofrequency ablation is slightly superior to electrocautery, diathermy is definitely a cheaper option and can be used with satisfactory considerable short-term results in left modified Maze procedure in case of absence of standard devices of ablation.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, diathermy ablation, left modified maze, radiofrequency ablation

How to cite this article:
El-Awady W. A comparison between monopolar radiofrequency ablation and electrocautery (Diathermy) ablations in left modified MAZE (short-term results). J Med Sci Res 2019;2:311-8

How to cite this URL:
El-Awady W. A comparison between monopolar radiofrequency ablation and electrocautery (Diathermy) ablations in left modified MAZE (short-term results). J Med Sci Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Apr 6];2:311-8. Available from: http://www.jmsr.eg.net/text.asp?2019/2/4/311/278066

  Introduction Top

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia seen in clinical practice and is often secondary to mitral valvular disease (80%)[1]. Patients experience a reduced quality of life, even after successful valve surgery, owing to continuing AF and its associated morbidity[2],[3]. Therefore, combination valve surgery and AF treatment in a single operation becomes an attractive goal for surgeons[4].

AF affects 6% of the population older than 65 years[5]. It is estimated that 1.4 million outpatient US hospital visits and 227 000 hospitalizations occur annually for the treatment of AF[6]. Anticoagulation, rate control, antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversion, and catheter ablation therapy all play a role in the treatment of this arrhythmia, but all of these strategies have had limited success.

AF is associated with increased morbidity and mortality [7],[8],[9],[10],[11]. Its medical treatment often yields unsatisfactory results[12],[13]. However, the Cox-Maze III procedure (CMP) has gained widespread clinical application owing to its perceived complexity[14].

Cox introduced the maze operation, a 'cut-and-suture' technique, in 1987. The procedure interrupts all possible macro re-entrant circuits responsible for AF by multiple surgical suture lines placed after surgery[15]. Results after a surgical maze procedure are encouraging, with sinus rhythm (SR) in 74–90% of patients at 2–3 years after surgery and operative mortality as low as 1%[16].

The Cox maze was achieved by creating a conduction block with transmural surgical incisions. Since its introduction, the operation has undergone two modifications. The CMP is the most recent version and has had an impressive success rate of more than 95% at 10 years[17]. However, implementation has been slowed by its perceived invasiveness and difficulty. The traditional 'cut-and-sew' technique requires cardiopulmonary bypass and can be time consuming. This has resulted in a hesitation by many surgeons to combine this procedure with valve repair or replacement. Furthermore, significant morbidity has been reported, including pacemaker requirement and left atrial dysfunction[18],[19].

Although Cox demonstrated the feasibility of treating AF surgically by interrupting the atrial pathways for multiple reentry circuits, which are necessary for the maintenance of AF[17],[20], new surgical techniques have focused on the development of potentially less invasive procedures by simplifying the pattern of atrial lesions and evaluating alternative energy sources that can create them quickly, without a cut-and-sew technique[3],[14],[21],[22],[23],[24].

More recently, simpler, less time-consuming 'partial Maze' procedures have been developed that have focused on creating surgical lesions in the left atrium predominantly[14]. A variety of patterns and devices with different energy sources have been introduced to perform a maze-like procedure more rapidly and safely[25].

Radiofrequency (RF) energy, which creates a blockage in lines of conduction by thermal damage and subsequent scar formation, is a relatively new energy modality being used for surgical ablation and treatment of AF and is highly effective[2],[3].

Introduction of cryoablation and radiofrequency endocardial ablation (RFA) has reduced the morbidity and mortality due to a surgical maze procedure[26]. RF microbipolar coagulation was used by Patwardhan et al.[27] to perform the CMP with the restoration of SR in 80% of patients. Mapping studies have shown that re-entrant circuits or ectopic foci exist in the posterior left atrial wall, especially around the pulmonary veins[28].

The cardioblate of the RFA system uses RF energy to create spot or linear lesions in cardiac tissue to block the electrical activity causing AF. It uses a saline-irrigated hand-held electrode, which provides low impedance, and the constant trickle of saline cools the surface of the atrial tissue, which minimizes charring and deep lesions. The tip of the electrode is moved back and forth on the atrial tissue until it becomes white, which confirms that the lesion is effective[29].

RF energy has frequently been used in the ablation of cardiac tissue. It is capable of producing myocardial necrosis when applied to either the endocardium or epicardium [30–32].

The utilization of diathermy (electrocautery) as an energy source in the treatment of chronic AF has generated positive early clinical results; although this technology is available and affordable, it has not been well studied for this indication[33],[34].

  Patients and Methods Top


A total of 40 patients underwent left modified MAZE as a surgical treatment for AF related to acquired heart disease between June 2010 and December 2016. Patients were invited to participate in the study after providing written informed consent besides approval for the release of information that was received from each patient.

Data collection

A total of 40 patients with AF and mitral disease or double valve disease, including mitral valve, had left modified MAZE (Cox III). Twenty patients had RFA (group A), and the other twenty had electrocautery (diathermy) ablation (group B), beside mitral valve repair, mitral valve replacement, or double valve replacement.

Inclusion criteria

Patients with a history of continuous AF for more than 6 months (chronic), age more than 18 years, and left atrial diameter more than 45 mm were included.

Exclusion criteria

Patients with a large left atrium (>70 mm), enlarged cardiothoracic ratio, longer duration of AF preoperatively (>20 years), multiple previous heart operations, pregnancy, active infective endocarditis, advanced age (>70 years), coronary artery disease, emergency surgery, and incapacity or refusal to participate in the study were excluded.

A 12-lead ECG was done on the day of the operation and repeated on fifth and seventh postoperative days. Echocardiography was done on the fifth postoperative day to assess the function of the valve repaired or the mechanical prosthetic valves replaced and left ventricle. Patients were followed up with ECG in the third and sixth months until 1-year follow-up after surgery.

The cardiac rhythm at the follow-up was based on ECG, and the rhythm was scored as a SR, AF/atrial flutter, nodal, or a pacemaker rhythm (heart block). Our maze procedures were considered successful in the case of restoration of SR as a result with or without pharmacological treatment.

Surgical procedure

Standard cardiopulmonary bypass was established, median sternotomy was performed mostly via bicaval cannulation, and cardiac arrest was obtained under aortic cross-clamping and repeated with antegrade cold blood-enriched crystalloid cardioplegia with moderate hypothermia. All the 40 surgical ablation procedures were performed concomitantly with mitral valve surgery. The left atrium was approached either through a standard left atriotomy, which was performed below the interatrial groove and extended inferiorly around the right inferior pulmonary vein, or trans-septal approach.

During the study period, the modified maze procedures were performed at the left atrium only using a variety of two types of devices with different energy sources, including RF and electrocautery (Diathermy).

Procedure specific to group A (radiofrequency ablation) All patients in group A had a left atrial maze procedure using RFA as an energy source. The procedure was performed on the endocardial surface of the heart before the actual mitral valve surgery. Monopolar saline-irrigated cooled tip RF ablation (SICTRA) was performed using the Medtronic Radiofrequency Generator Model 68 000 (710 Medtronic Parkway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55432-5604 USA) as an energy source [Figure 1].
Figure 1: Medtronic radiofrequency generator model 68000.

Click here to view

A voltage of 25–30 W was adjusted according to the effectiveness of ablation. Oscillatory and to-and-fro motions were employed on the atrial endocardium using the cardioblate pen [Figure 2] until proper blanching or whitening was achieved. Prolonged or repeated application was done when necessary to achieve a full-thickness scar.
Figure 2: Monopolar SICTRA Medtronic probe (Cardioblate pen).

Click here to view

Procedure specific to group B (electrocautery ablation)

All patients in group B had a left atrial maze procedure using electrocautery ablation as an energy source. The procedure was performed on the endocardial surface of the heart before the actual mitral valve surgery. The initial cautery lesions are placed using the 'spray mode' of an ordinary cautery pencil connected to a diathermy machine (COVIDIEN Force FX Electrosurgical Generator, 710 MEDTRONIC PARKWAY MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432-5604 USA) set at 30 W and using the coagulation – spray setting [Figure 3]. Lesions are created by a slow progression of the pencil such that the tissue is blanched when the cautery arc is moved against the tissue. As the spark mode arc is employed in an empty heart, alteration in conductivity (due to blood and charring) is typically avoided, and the rate of progression of the cautery is primarily determined by blanching. This is approximately at the rate of around 1–3 s/cm. The cautery is never kept stationary as it has to be moved as soon as the tissue blanches.
Figure 3: COVIDIEN force FX electrosurgical generator monopolar diathermy.

Click here to view

Inspection of the left atrium and left atrial appendage for thrombus was done, and a 3-0 polypropylene purse string suture was used to close the left atrial appendage from inside. TEE was removed from behind the left atrium during pulmonary veins and posterior left atrium ablations to avoid esophageal injury. The endocardial ablation lines were done around both right pulmonary veins (superior and inferior) with 1-cm distance to avoid pulmonary vein stenosis later on and then both left pulmonary veins (superior and inferior) were encircled at the same fashion, and then connected together by one or two ablation lines (in case of large left atrium), and another connecting endocardial ablation line to the encircled closed left atrial appendage.

A connecting endocardial ablation line to the mitral valve annulus crosses over the circumflex coronary artery. To avoid any collateral damage to the circumflex coronary artery while performing the ablation line toward the mitral annulus, we targeted the P2–P3 segment of the mitral valve annulus in mitral valve repair or 5 o'clock position in mitral valve replacement while we give antegrade cold cardioplegic solution during the ablation in both groups. Lastly, a blind-ended line was drawn perpendicular to the line running from the left pulmonary vein island toward the mitral annulus. It ran across the isthmus and toward the area of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and stopping just short of the atriotomy incision [Figure 4].
Figure 4: Diagram of the maze lines performed in the left atrium. It included pulmonary vein isolation where both left pulmonary veins and both right pulmonary veins were isolated separately. A roofing line between the two superior pulmonary veins was done as well as two lines extending from the left pulmonary vein island, one going toward the base of the left atrial appendage and the other toward the annulus of the mitral valve at a point corresponding to the middle of the posterior mitral leaflet. Another blind-ended line was drawn perpendicular to the line running from the left pulmonary vein island toward the mitral annulus. It ran across the isthmus and toward the area of the IVC and stopping just short of the atriotomy incision. (1) Closed LAA, (2) mitral valve, (3) isolated left pulmonary veins island, (4) isolated right pulmonary veins island.

Click here to view

The operative field was kept dry during endocardium cauterization by two aspirators. Careful washing of the atrial chamber was performed with slightly wet gauzes before its closure to remove the carbonization products to avoid an occasional systemic embolism. The left atriotomy is then closed after finishing the mitral valve. The heart is de-aired, and the patient is weaned off CPB in a routine manner. Atrial and ventricular wires are placed. Care is taken to place the atrial wires.

Perioperative AF was treated with either intravenous or oral amiodarone. If the drug was not tolerated, patients were managed with rate control medication and elective cardioversion at 2–6 weeks.

Postoperative care

Patients who are in SR were put on an infusion of amiodarone (10 mg/kg/24 h) and then an oral amiodarone 200 mg/day for 3 months. In patients who had nodal rhythm, temporary atrioventricular pacing was instituted. Amiodarone was given primarily to ensure decreased atrial automaticity to offset the increased atrial tissue conduction speed that can cause transient AF despite adequate maze lesions. This is done to ensure the maintenance of SR postoperatively at all times to ease hemodynamic management in sick left ventricles; the addition of amiodarone, even though only 3 months, ensures the maintenance of SR and early return of atrial function. Multinodal attack of AF (maze + amiodarone + optional atrial pacing) ensures a controlled SR throughout the immediate postoperative period and makes it smoother. Coumadin was given for patients with valve replacement, and aspirin was given to patients with the repair for life.

  Results Top

The mean age was 32.9 ± 18.1 years, with 38.3 ± 12.7 and 27.7 ± 22.3 years for groups A and B, respectively; there was no mortality in both groups. There were 14 (35%) males, with eight and six males in groups A and B, respectively, and there were 26 (65%) females, with 12 and 14 females in groups A and B, respectively. There were 14 (35%) patients with paroxysmal AF; 10 of them were in group A, and the other four were in group B. There were 26 (65%) patients with persistent AF; 10 of them were in group A and the other 16 were in group B. We had two patients were done as redo cases, and all of them were in group B. The mean left atrial size ranged from 62.6 ± 27.4 mm, with 59.9 ± 30.1 min group A and 68 ± 22 mm in group B. The left atrial approach during the procedure was 32 (80%), with 12 and 20 patients in groups A and B, respectively; all patients in group B were done through the left atrial approach. The transseptal approach was done in eight (20%) patients, and all of them were in group A. Patient demographics characteristics, and concomitant procedures are shown in [Table 1]. The mean CPB time was 115.1 ± 84.9 min, with 113.6 ± 16.4 min and 117.5 ± 82.5 min in groups A and B, respectively. The mean cross-clamp time was 86 ± 64 min, with 83.1 ± 11.9 and 90.8 ± 59.2 min in groups A and B, respectively. There were no reoperations for failed valve repairs, but we had one patient in group B with prolonged cross-clamp time (150 min) and prolonged CPB time (200 min) due to mitral valve repair, with a flexible ring had to be revised with a rigid ring along with a ring in the tricuspid valve in a beating heart. We had two (5%) patients with bleeding, and all of them were in group A. Sixteen (40%) patients needed inotropic support postoperatively; four of them were in group A and 12 were in group B. Six (15%) patients had low cardiac output postoperatively, with two in group A and four in group B. The incidence of freedom from AF was 45% at the end of the operation (40% of patients with normal SR with group A and 50% with group B); after 1-year follow-up, this incidence increased to 67.5%, with 70% in group A and 65% in group B. Two (5%) patients in group A required a temporary pacemaker implantation because of a third-degree atrioventricular block; after 1 year, one patient required permanent pacemaker. No mortality as long as nor stroke or any thromboembolic events were detected in any patient.
Table 1: The demographic characteristics of the study group

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

The CMP was developed to restore normal SR, to allow for the discontinuation of anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic drugs, and to reduce stroke risk[35],[36].

The incidence of AF in patients with mitral valve disease is ~40–60%. Jatene et al.[37] confirmed the benefits of the Maze operation in patients undergoing mitral valve repair. Only 5.3% of the patients undergoing Cox's technique developed AF after 37 months versus 76.5% of those who underwent valve repair alone.

Between January 1988 and January 2002, the freedom from recurrent AF at 14 years in Maze procedure was 93%. The excellent long-term results with this operation established it as the standard for the surgical treatment of AF. Despite these excellent results, the operation required a relatively long period of cardiopulmonary bypass and an arrested heart[25]. That is why modified maze procedure in patients with AF and undergoing MVR has given encouraging results[38],[39].

The Framingham study[40] has shown that the incidence of stroke is five times higher in patients with AF. The effect in the quality of life decreased physical capacity, and consequently, decreased labor capacity, complications, and sequelae; increased mortality rate in patients with this disease and increased medical expenses show the importance of its diagnosis and adequate treatment. Some surgeons do not perform maze procedure in addition to MVR with mechanical valves because these patients receive systemic anticoagulation after surgery. Bando et al.[41] had 8 of 10 late strokes among patients receiving optimal anticoagulation which indicates that although anticoagulation is beneficial, it does not abolish the risk of stroke associated with AF. In our study, we had neither stroke (0%) nor mortality (0%), but there were morbidities.

Bakker and associates stated that the probability of AF after the maze procedure varies with time, remaining quite low during the first postoperative months and increasing gradually after that. Decreased left ventricular function, increased age, and increased preoperative creatinine levels were associated with a decreased probability of sustained SR. Although the 30-day mortality was relatively high, it was explained by preoperative characteristics and by the complexity of the cardiac procedure[42].

Significant mitral valve disease is often associated with chronic AF, and ~60–80% of mitral valve cases referred for surgery are reported to have AF[1]. All the cases in our study had mitral valve disease as a fixed pathology, as we have a comparison between two variable ablation devices.

Elimination of the extensive cutting and sewing needed to make the atrial incisions of the CMP gives these new operations the potential to simplify the procedure and decrease the time of surgery. The hope is that this will reduce morbidity, encourage referrals, and speed the adoption of this operation by surgeons.

Many groups also have chosen to omit many of the incisions of the Cox maze procedure. This has made clinical interpretation results difficult because failure could be due either to inadequate ablation technology or to an inadequate lesion set. It was our goal to perform all the basic lesions of left-sided Maze but to replace all of the incisions with lines of ablation.

The average cross-clamp time to perform alone maze procedure (cut and suture) was 93 ± 34 min. After CMP, 15% of the patients required postoperative pacemakers[43]. These problems with the traditional CMP have authors and others to begin evaluating strategies to simplify the surgical treatment of AF[21],[44]. In our study, the mean cross-clamp time of concomitant procedures was 86 ± 64 min, with 83.1 ± 11.9 for RFA and 90.8 ± 59.2 min for electrocautery. We had 2.5% of all patients who required a postoperative pacemaker, such a case had RFA and developed heart block.

Sie et al.[45] published a study with the use of RF for AF ablation, in which they followed the lines proposed by Cox's procedure in a biatrial approach, reaching 79% of the regular rhythm at 6 months of clinical follow-up. Abreu Filho et al.[46] published a study with similar characteristics to the aforementioned study, with a success rate of 72.7%, representing patients free of AF at 12-month follow-up. Another two studies by Sie and Khargi were among the first groups to use the irrigated RF device for the surgical treatment of AF[2],[47]. Sie et al.[2] reported incidences of freedom from AF at 1 and 2 years of 98 and 86%, respectively. A recent review of the literature shows that the incidence of SR restoration at 1 year varies between 62 and 98% among series using RF energy[3],[22]. These differences can be attributed to variations in patient selection, ablation patterns, and the technical equipment used. Patient selection probably remains the most important factor affecting the outcome of the procedure[48]. Patients with a large left atrium and patients with an enlarged cardiothoracic ratio seem to have a decreased rate of SR restoration[48]. In our study, the incidence of freedom of AF in monopolar RFA and diathermy group was 70 and 65%, respectively, at a 12-month follow-up.

Esophageal injury and coronary artery damage (the circumflex artery) are two serious complications that have been reported during RF ablation[49],[50]. Esophageal injury attributed to heatwaves transmitted by the TEE probe. Therefore, the removal of the probe before beginning the ablation is mandatory. Moreover, the type of RF device, the amount of energy delivered, and the ablation pattern are other points that need to be considered to minimize such complications. The pulmonary vein is a thin structure that is close to the esophagus, and ablation inside the pulmonary veins may increase the chance of esophageal injury [49–51]. The saline irrigation has some theoretical advantages over dry RF systems. It lowers the surface temperature so that direct heating is transmitted below the surface, resulting in a lesion of greater depth and higher chances of creating a transmural lesion. Irrigation obviates firm contact and pressure. In our study, we had no incidence of esophageal or coronary artery injury, in either of the groups.

A common strategy has been to replace the surgical incisions with linear lines of ablation made using various energy sources, including RF, cryoablation, microwave, ultrasound, and laser energy[52],[53].

Deneke et al.[54], in a randomized prospective trial using cooled-tip RFA, demonstrated that the modified maze procedure produced SR in about 80% of patients at a 1-year follow-up and also showed an improvement in the functional capacity of patients undergoing the maze procedure along with mitral valve replacement. The percentage of patients with chronic AF and mitral valve disease reverting to SR after a mitral valve surgery alone is between 8 and 27%[55]. In our study, we had nearly the same results in the RFA group at a 1-year follow-up (70%).

Although Güden et al.[4] had favorable short-term and intermediate-term follow-up results of unipolar RF, 92% of the patients received biatrial (n = 9) and left maze (n = 34), being free of AF at 12 months. In our study, we had 70% of patients who received left modified maze only, being free of AF at 12-month follow-up with monopolar RFA.

Kress et al.[23] have shown in an animal model that a lesion pattern consisting of electrically isolating the pulmonary veins and the left atrial appendage and the creation of left atrial connecting lesions was 100% effective in terminating AF, compared with other models consisting of pulmonary vein isolation alone.

Lam et al.[56] stated in a study of surgical treatment of AF with diathermyin vitro that the best results (high tissue coagulation necrosis, low risk of perforation) would come from spray mode with a power of setting between 30 and 35 W, along with contact times of 1–3 s/cm. He also stated that although they have not found diathermy capable of creating transmural lesions histologically, there were excellent clinical results from reported series, which certainly call into question the need for transmurality as a prerequisite for electrical isolation. In our study, we used the power of setting 30 W in our diathermy group, along with contact times 1–3 s/cm with the restoration of SR 65% after 1-year follow-up.

Simha et al.[33] presented their initial experience with 25 patients undergoing the Maze procedure by electrocautery. Lesions similar to those of the Cox-Maze procedure were reproduced using an electrocautery knife set on 'spray' mode, with the power output of 40 W and at a nonspecific contact time. There were no complications reported, and SR was restored in 96% of patients at a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. His study also showed that using electrocautery at that output to perform biatrial endocardial ablation, 36% of the patients required definitive pacemaker implantation. In our study, in which the approach was restricted only to the left atrium with a lower power output of 30 W, we had no patient with diathermy ablation group who required a pacemaker.

Similarly, Desaulniers et al.[34] presented their results using an electrocautery knife tip set on spray mode at a power of setting of 26 W to reproduce Maze lesions in the left atrium; 70% of their patients were in SR at short-term follow-up. In our study, we had nearly the same results in diathermy ablation group; we used an electrocautery knife set on 'spray' mode, with the power output of 30 W with contact times 1–3 s/cm, and 65% of patients were in SR at short-term follow-up (1 year) in left maze only.

Inamdar et al.[57], in an approach only to the left using electrocautery, observed a high rate of AF recurrence in the first months postoperatively, possibly owing to inadequate ablation of atrial tissue, producing incomplete lines. Additionally, it was hypothesized that it would be necessary 3–6 months to complete the cicatrization of the ablation lines to achieve an efficient electrical stimulus block. Recidivation of AF in the first weeks after ablation is evident, not meaning procedure failure. In our study, 40% of RFA and 50% of diathermy patients were inSR immediately after the operation; this rate raised to 70% of RFA and 65% of diathermy after 1 year of follow-up. This fact can also be explained by the postoperative transient atrial inflammatory process and by the transoperative atrial ischemia[58],[59]. Other studies have described ectopic focuses external to the pulmonary veins, or arising from other atrial structures, which would be related to the recidivation of postoperative AF[60],[61].

Recurrence is influenced by the type and duration of AF, choice of lesion set in permanent AF, and left atrial size, so that early operation, careful choice of lesion set, and left atrial reduction might enhance results. To reduce recurrence, it has also been suggested that routine prophylactic use of antiarrhythmic drugs has a major role in the high rates of conversion to SR. However, these ideas do not seem to be justified by the data coming from recent studies[27],[48],[62]. We used antiarrhythmic drugs for 3 months after the procedure in both groups to maintain normal SR.

  Conclusion Top

Although monopolar RFA is slightly superior to electrocautery, diathermy is definitely a cheap option and can be used with satisfactory considerable short-term results in left modified Maze procedure in case of absence of standard devices of ablation.


The current study has several limitations that should be considered. This is a small prospective cohort, single-center study. These limitations as it represents our preliminary experience with a small number of patients and short-term results need to be confirmed by larger series with longer follow-up which can determine whether these procedures have effective long-term results or not. This study does not take into consideration the electrophysiological properties of diathermy on atrial tissue. The ECG is a 'snapshot' in time and has limited ability to detect transient atrial arrhythmias in patients during the follow-up period.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med 1995; 155:469–473.  Back to cited text no. 1
Sie HT, Beukema WP, Misier AR, Elvan A, Ennema JJ, Haalebos MM, et al. Radiofrequency modified maze in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:249-56.  Back to cited text no. 2
Güden M, Akpınar B, Sanisoglu I, Sagbas E, Bayındır O. Intraoperative saline-irrigated radiofrequency modified maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:S1301–S1306.  Back to cited text no. 3
Güden M, Akpinar B, Sagbas E, Sanisoglu I, Ergenoglu MU, Ozbek U. A radiofrequency modified maze and valve procedure through a port-access approach. Heart Surg Forum 2003; 6:292–296.  Back to cited text no. 4
Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Manilo TA, Gardin JM, Smith VE, Rautaharju PM. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol 1994; 74:236–241.  Back to cited text no. 5
National Center for Health Statistics. Public use data tape documentation: 1995 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, US Public Health Service; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 6
Schuetz A, Schulze CJ, Sarvanakis KK, Mair H, Plazer H, Kilger E, et al. Surgical treatment of permanent atrial fibrillation using microwave energy ablation: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003; 24:475–480.  Back to cited text no. 7
Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D. Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham heart study. Circulation 1998; 98:946–952.  Back to cited text no. 8
Falk RH. Atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2001; 344:1067–78.  Back to cited text no. 9
Cox JL. Intraoperative options for treating atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122:212–215.  Back to cited text no. 10
Ad N, Cox JL. Stroke prevention as an indication for the Maze procedure in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 12:56–62.  Back to cited text no. 11
Ezekowitz MD, Netrebko PI. Anticoagulation in management of atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003; 18:26–31.  Back to cited text no. 12
Lundstrom T, Ryden L. Chronic atrial fibrillation. Long-term results of direct current conversion. Acta Med Scand 1988; 223:53–59.  Back to cited text no. 13
Kondo N, Takahashi K, Minakawa M, Daitoku K. Left atrial maze procedure: a useful addition to other corrective operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:1490–1494.  Back to cited text no. 14
Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Ferguson TBJr, Cain ME, Lindasy BD, et al. Successful surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Review and clinical update. JAMA 1991; 266:1976–1980.  Back to cited text no. 15
Scheinman MM, Morady F. Nonpharmacological approaches to atrial fibrillation. Circulation2001; 103:2120–2125.  Back to cited text no. 16
Cox JL, Ad N, Palazzo T, Fitzpatrick S, Suyderhoud JP, DeGroot KW, et al. Current status of the maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 12:15–19.  Back to cited text no. 17
Lonnerholm S, Blomstrom P, Nilsson L, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Atrial size and transport function after the maze III procedure for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 71:107–111.  Back to cited text no. 18
Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Orszula TA, Danielson GK. Cox-maze procedure for atrial fibrillation: Mayo Clinic experience. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 12:30–37.  Back to cited text no. 19
Cox JL, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP. The development of the Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 12:2–14.  Back to cited text no. 20
Knaut M, Tugtekin SM, Spitzer S, Gulielmos V. Combined atrial fibrillation and mitral valve surgery using microwave technology. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 14:226–231.  Back to cited text no. 21
Benussi S, Nascimbene S, Agricola E, Calori G, Calvi S, Caldarola A, et al. Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation using the epicardial radiofrequency approach: mid-term results and risk analysis. Ann Thorac Surg2002; 74:1050–1057.  Back to cited text no. 22
Kress DC, Krum D, Chekanov V, Hare J, Michaud N, Akhtar M, Sra J. Validation of a left atrial lesion pattern for intraoperative ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73:1160–1168.  Back to cited text no. 23
Deneke T, Khargi K, Grewe PH, von Dryander S, Kuschkowitz F, Lawo T, et al. Left atrial versus bi-atrial Maze operation using intraoperatively cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation in patients undergoing open-heart surgery: safety and efficacy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39:1644–1650.  Back to cited text no. 24
Prasad SM, Maniar HS, Camillo CJ, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Sundt TM, et al. The Cox maze III procedure for atrial fibrillation: long-term efficacy in patients undergoing lone versus concomitant procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126:1822–1828.  Back to cited text no. 25
Pappone C. Atrial fibrillation – a curable condition? Eur Heart J 2002; 23:514–517.  Back to cited text no. 26
Patwardhan AM, Dave HH, Tamhane AA, Pandit SP, Dalvi BV, Golam K, et al. Intraoperative radiofrequency microbipolar coagulation to replace incisions of the maze III procedure for correcting atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatic valvular disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 12:627–633.  Back to cited text no. 27
Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, et al. Spontanous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:659–666.  Back to cited text no. 28
Kumar SPM, Bharat D, Rao S, Dash PK. Use of radiofrequency ablation in the modified maze procedure. Indian Heart J 2002; 54:723–725.  Back to cited text no. 29
Jazayeri MR, Hempe SL, Sra JS, Dhala AA, Blanck Z, Deshpande SS, et al. Selective transcatheter ablation of the fast and slow pathways using radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Circulation 1992; 85:1318–1328.  Back to cited text no. 30
Jais P, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M, Takahashi A, Lavergne T, Hocini M, et al. Efficacy and safety of septal and left-atrial linear ablation for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84 (9A):139R–146RR.  Back to cited text no. 31
Dagres N, Clague JR, Lottkamp H, Hindricks G, Breithardt G, Borg- grefe M. Impact of radiofrequency ablation of accessory pathways on the frequency of atrial fibrillation during long-term follow-up: high recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation in patients older than 50 years of age. Eur Heart J 2001; 22:423–427.  Back to cited text no. 32
Simha P, Bhat PS, Rabhudeva N. The electrocautery maze – how I do it. Heart Surg Forum 2001; 4:340–344.  Back to cited text no. 33
Desaulniers D, Mullen J, Champagne J, Dagenais F, Baillot R, Mathieu P, et al. Non transmural low intensity radiofrequency linear ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol 2003; 19:254A.  Back to cited text no. 34
Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D'Agostino HJJr, Stone CM, Chang BC, Cain ME, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991; 101:569–583.  Back to cited text no. 35
Cox JL, Sundt TMIII. The surgical management of atrial fibrillation. Annu Rev Med 1997; 48:511–523.  Back to cited text no. 36
Jatene MB, Barbero-Marcial M, Tarasoutchi F, Cardoso RA, Pomerantzeff PMA, Jatene AD. Influência da operação de Cox no tratamento da fibrilação atrial em valvopatia mitral reumática: análise comparativa de resultados imediatos e tardios. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 1998; 13:105–119.  Back to cited text no. 37
Kosakai Y, Kawaguchi AT, Isobe F, Sasako Y, Nakano K, Eishi K, et al. Cox maze procedure for chronic atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1994; 108:1049–1055.  Back to cited text no. 38
Melo J, Adragao P, Neves J, Ferreira MM, Pinto MM, Rebocho MJ, et al. Surgery for atrial fibrillation using radiofrequency catheter ablation: assessment of results at one year. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg1999; 15:851–855.  Back to cited text no. 39
Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke 1991; 22:983–988.  Back to cited text no. 40
Bando K, Kobayashi J, Kosaki Y, Hirata M, Sasako Y, Nakatani S, et al. Impact of cox maze procedure on outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124:575–583.  Back to cited text no. 41
Bakker RC, Akin S, Rizopoulos D, Kik C, Takkenberg JJ, Bogers AJ. Results of clinical application of the modified maze procedure as concomitant surgery. Interactive CardioVasc Thorac Surg J 2012;16:151-6.  Back to cited text no. 42
Gaynor SL, Diodato MD, Prasad SM, Ishii Y, Schuessler RB, Bailey MS, et al. A prospective, single-center clinical trial of a modified Cox maze procedure with bipolar radiofrequency ablation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128:535–542.  Back to cited text no. 43
Hindricks G, Mohr FW, Autschbach R, Kottkamp H. Antiarrhythmic surgery for treatment of atrial fibrillation – new concepts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 47 (Suppl 3):365–369.  Back to cited text no. 44
Sie HT, Beukema WP, Ramdat Misier AR, Elvan A, Ennema JJ, Wellens HJ. The radiofrequency modified maze procedure. A less invasive surgical approach to atrial fibrillation during open heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001; 19:443–447.  Back to cited text no. 45
Abreu Filho CAC, Dallan LAO, Lisboa LAF, Spina GS, Scanavacca M, Grinberg M, et al. Resultados da ablação cirúrgica por radiofreqüência da fibrilação atrial crônica. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 2004;19:301–308.  Back to cited text no. 46
Khargi K, Deneke T, Haardt H, Lemke B, Grewe P, Müller KM, et al. Saline-irrigated, cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation is an effective technique to perform the maze procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:S1090-5.  Back to cited text no. 47
Kosaka Y. Maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. In: Franco KL, Verrier ED, editors. Advanced therapy in cardiac surgery. St. Louis, MO: B. C. Decker; 1999. 250–257.  Back to cited text no. 48
Gillinov AM, Petterson G, Rice TW. Esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122:1239–1240.  Back to cited text no. 49
Patwardhan AM, Lad VS, Pai V. Esophageal injury during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: inherent safety of radiofrequency bipolar coagulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124:642–643.  Back to cited text no. 50
Mohr FW, Fabricius AM, Falk V, Autschbach R, Doll N, Von Oppell U, et al. Curative treatment of atrial fibrillation with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation: short-term and midterm results. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:919-27.  Back to cited text no. 51
Knaut M, Spitzer SG, Karolyi L, Ebert H, Richter P, Tugtekin SM, et al. Intraoperative microwave ablation for curative treatment of atrial fibrillation in open heart surgery: the MICRO-STAF and MICRO-PASS pilot trial. MICROwave application in surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. MICROwave application for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in bypass-surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 47 (Suppl 3):379–384.  Back to cited text no. 52
Gillinov AM, Smedira NG, Cosgrove DMIII. Microwave ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 74:1259–1261.  Back to cited text no. 53
Deneke T, Khargi K, Grewe PH, Laczkovics A, von Dryander S, Lawo T, et al. Efficacy of an additional MAZE procedure using cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and mitral valve disease. A randomized, prospective trial. Eur Heart J2002; 23:558–566.  Back to cited text no. 54
Handa N, Schaff HV, Morris JJ, Anderson BJ, Kopecky SL, Enriquez – Sarano M. Outcome of valve repair and the Cox maze procedure for mitral regurgitation and associated atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 118:628–635.  Back to cited text no. 55
Lam BK, Boodhwani M, Veinot JP, Hendry PJ, Mesana TG. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation with diathermy: anin vitro study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27:456–461.  Back to cited text no. 56
Inamdar A, Reddy P, Inamdar S, Gaikwad V. Eletrocautery maze in chronic atrial fibrillation: an early experience. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005; 21:9–14.  Back to cited text no. 57
Chung MK, Martin DO, Sprecher D, Wazni O, Kanderian A, Carnes CA, et al. C-reactive protein elevation in patients with atrial arrhythmias: inflammatory mechanisms and persistence of atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2001; 104:2886–2891.  Back to cited text no. 58
Ishii Y, Gleva MJ, Gamache MC, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Bailey MS, et al. Atrial tachyarrhythmias after the maze procedure: incidence and prognosis. Circulation 2004; 110 (Suppl 1):II164–II168.  Back to cited text no. 59
Tsai CF, Tai CT, Hsieh MH, Lin WS, Yu WC, Ueng KC, et al. Initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating from the superior vena cava: electrophysiological characteristics and results of radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 2000; 102:67–74.  Back to cited text no. 60
Hwang C, Wu TJ, Doshi RN, Peter CT, Chen PS. Vein of marshall cannulation for the analysis of electrical activity in patients with focal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2000; 101:1503–1505.  Back to cited text no. 61
Benussi S, Pappone C, Nascimbene S, Oreto G, Caldarola A, Stefano PL, et al. A simple way to treat chronic atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: the epicardial radiofrequency approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000;17:524-9.  Back to cited text no. 62


  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]

  [Table 1]


    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  In this article
Patients and Methods
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded6    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal